Ben Gvir, the Cabinet and Hypocrisy

I also think it's an inappropriate demand. Lapid raised it, but Gantz didn't. The added value of an emergency government is not the experience of Gantz and Eisenkot, but the legitimacy and trust of citizens and soldiers and the world. Therefore, it doesn't really matter how many chiefs of staff there are. In terms of creative thinking and decision-making, I don't think it's the government's job, and the army is probably weak in that either. I would expect them to now establish a multidisciplinary think tank to get a coherent proposal on the way to act. There are ethical, political, and operational aspects, and of course public ones as well. Creative minds are needed. In my opinion, the problem and the (justified) lack of trust are in the army and the government. They have demonstrated a lack of thinking and abject incompetence, and a replacement needs to be found. They need to focus on execution.