חדש באתר: מיכי-בוט. עוזר חכם על כתבי הרב מיכאל אברהם.

Does a chain of probabilities still indicate rational choice?

שו"תקטגוריה: faithDoes a chain of probabilities still indicate rational choice?
שאל לפני 12 חודשים

Hello Rabbi Michael,
 
As I understand it, your course of faith is this: It is likely that there is a God (in light of various arguments). Given that he exists (and in light of several other data) it is likely that he has been discovered. In other words, there are two arguments of probability here that ride on top of each other. Now, I know that there is a certain problem in quantifying this, but to clarify my question I will give these probabilities numbers.
 
Let's say, a – there is a God. Chance: 60%.
And: b- God has revealed himself. The chance – *given a* – is 70%.
 
It can be seen that even though each step along the way is plausible (i.e., most of the chances are in favor of it), it still turns out that the chance that b happened is 42% (0.6*0.7). That is, most of the chances that b did not happen. So it is seemingly irrational to believe in this scenario – despite the likelihood of each step.
 
On the other hand, it can be said that it is the most likely scenario (only a and not b – 18% chance. Not a – 40% chance). So it can be argued that it is still rational to believe in b. But in our case there is no practical difference between "only a and not b" ​​and "not a" – because in both cases God has not revealed himself and therefore there is no obligation to keep the commandments. Therefore, it is correct to examine this from the perspective of what is the chance that b is true in itself and not what is the most likely scenario among the options. And so it turns out that belief in revelation is irrational, even if each step in the chain is reasonable.
 
I would love to hear your opinion. Since you ultimately claim that keeping the commandments is the rational choice, I assume that: either you disagree with this analysis, or that in your opinion "the percentages are higher" (even if this is intuitive and cannot really be quantified like this. The numbers are just to clarify the point). I would love to hear which of the two options you think.
 
thanks!


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 12 חודשים
I disagree with the quantification. The chance that it happened by chance is zero. The chance that it will be discovered is very large. In any case, it is difficult to quantify and therefore you have to make decisions from a general impression. Probability and not probability. I would point out that you could have included more stations: the chance that it exists. the chance that it was created. the chance that it has a message for us. the chance that it was discovered to convey the message. the chance that we understood it correctly. the chance that it was conveyed to us properly, and so on. That way you will arrive at some crazy percentages. By the way, even in a legal debate involving two claims, and each of them has a majority of 2 to 1, the majority decision is accepted, even though the chance that both claims are correct is 4/9. Search here on the 'Paradox of Justice' website.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button