חדש באתר: מיכי-בוט. עוזר חכם על כתבי הרב מיכאל אברהם.

Male sexual intercourse

שו"תMale sexual intercourse
שאל לפני 3 שנים

Hello Rabbi
In the chapter on homosexuality on page 527 under the heading on the changes in halakha
You wrote and tried to explain how it is possible today for a woman to have sexual intercourse with a man.
Because of the rape they have, since they know today that it is a natural tendency
And not because of the urge, and once the jurists forbade it because they thought it was because of the urge.
"You assume the ban is aimed at ordinary people."
1) Note on the page above – it seems on the surface that you are trying to explain
How can it be possible to allow an explicit prohibition (male intercourse) in the Torah that is
Sounds completely rustic and you should have stated that you intended to exempt
Because of rape, I had a hard time believing it, except for the book, I bothered.
Also check here on the website in column 225 in the column's talkback and there is clarification.
That this is a retroactive authorization to exempt him from punishment for rape.
2) You are saying that the prohibition (the act itself) should not be relevant today towards
Homosexuals because of the sexual agony they go through, and I am very surprised.
Did God, blessed be He, not take this into account when He commanded this?
The difficulty, for God does not test a person unless he can withstand it.
In it, and even more, by doing so you empty the mitzvah of its meaning if it does not apply to
Who would this be directed at, a normal person who doesn't have a strong desire for the same sex?
 
 


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 3 שנים
First, as a general rule, I'm not really interested in whether my words are heretical or not. For me, what matters is whether they are true or not. As for the matter itself, there is room to see this as a rape allegation, but it seems simple to me. It is complete rape. My argument is that there is perhaps room to say that the prohibition was originally stated only for those who do so because of their instincts and not for those for whom it is their nature. Therefore, I do not understand what you are making difficult of God. If I am right, then He also intended this. The assumption that He does not test a person with a trial that he cannot withstand is a fallacy that I do not know where it is derived from. There are quite a few people who, in my opinion, are candidates for trials that they cannot withstand. From the Kleptumenis, continuing in the Bisra al-Basha, and ending with the words of Rabbi Elai about a person who sees that his instincts are overcoming him (see Rief and Rosh in the MOK, who wrote that his words contradict the Mimra Everything is in the hands of Heaven except for Riesh).

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button