חדש באתר: מיכי-בוט. עוזר חכם על כתבי הרב מיכאל אברהם.

Psychophilosophy studies

שו"תPsychophilosophy studies
שאל לפני 4 שנים

Hello Rabbi, I wanted to ask a pragmatic question first: what research in psychology do you think could advance research in philosophy?
The Rabbi actually proposes in his philosophical approach an additional "unconscious"
Unlike the impulsive unconscious known in psychoanalysis, there is the intuitive unconscious that the Rabbi proposes. This unconscious can be discovered through the analysis of our intuitive assumptions and the connection of intuitive assumptions that will lead to a conclusion.
In fact, philosophical discourse reveals this.
This element that the Rabbi explains actually reveals to us our true unconscious.

Now, it seems to me that from a psychological perspective, we need to examine whether the person who discovers this really believes what he unconsciously assumes, even when we show him.
For example, a person who claims to be an atheist who believes in the principle of causality, the concept of planning, morality, etc., will it seem to him that this indicates belief in God? Will he accept that he believes in God unconsciously?
Could such research advance the philosophical discourse on the subject, according to the Rabbi, or does it actually fall on another plane?


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 4 שנים
I make a clear distinction between the fields. In my opinion, there is no connection between psychology and philosophy, and the research you are proposing here is philosophical, not psychological. If the person does not accept the conclusions that arise from his words, he should explain which assumption is unacceptable to him or point out an error in the argument. Either way, this is a philosophical discussion. Nothing to do with psychology.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button