חדש באתר: מיכי-בוט. עוזר חכם על כתבי הרב מיכאל אברהם.

Question about column 559

שו"תQuestion about column 559
שאל לפני 3 שנים

The Rabbi wrote in a column that work for its own sake is only for its own sake because that is the truth and this is essentially the "love" that Maimonides is talking about. It's hard for me.
A. Simply put, love is an emotion.
on. The example of a woman's love.
third. If a person knows the truth about the existence of God but hates Him, according to the Rabbi, can he be said to "love" God?
D. The rabbi claimed that someone who works out of love does not work for the sake of it, and the rabbi noted in parentheses the Maimonides in the Law of Moses that a person who works out of love is exempt. There it really means that it is "love that depends on a thing" ("because he desired in this way"), but it can be said that love that does not depend on a thing is not considered utilitarian. If we say that there is love that does not depend on a thing and stems purely from a pure desire to do good and not receive anything in return, in fact, love can also be for the sake of it, then the Rambam simply states…


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 3 שנים
I referred to places where I expanded on all this. Love is an emotional expression of a cognitive state. I argued that the expression is not the point. The example of loving a woman is discussed there. If he knows the truth, he can't possibly hate him. In my opinion, there is no love that begins as independent of anything. The initial encounter is always made through something, and then it can become independent of anything. And with God, there is really no encounter. But, as mentioned, my words are not based on the Rambam's interpretation but on the explanation. The Rambam's interpretation is a result.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button