Responsa Ben Ish Chai

I once saw in one of your classes that you brought the Ben Ish Chai who tells in his Responsa about his grandfather who was also a rabbi in Baghdad. And the members of his community accidentally put on round tefillin. Until a Shaddar came there and told them they were wrong. Then they changed, of course. And the Ben Ish Chai writes. Don't think that they didn't put on tefillin, but it was considered to them as if they put on tefillin. So you said you don't understand. Of course they won't be punished because it was accidental. But how is it considered as if they put on! So I claim that the Ben Ish Chai assumed that a good thought, blessed be He, accompanies the action. Does this answer your opinion?