חדש באתר: מיכי-בוט. עוזר חכם על כתבי הרב מיכאל אברהם.

The Evidence from the Material – Yuval Steinz

שו"תקטגוריה: faithThe Evidence from the Material – Yuval Steinz
שאל לפני 8 שנים

Hello Rabbi,
I wanted to know what the rabbi's opinion was on the testimony of Rabbi Yuval Steinitz (in our time, it is already possible to be a rabbi and be a heretic…)
His evidence is something like this:
Someone who claims that God moves material bodies at every moment (i.e., the laws of nature are entities – I saw that the Rabbi accepted this).
He argues this based on the assertion that matter is incapable of knowing the laws of nature and enforcing them upon itself. After all, the law of conservation of matter is itself a law of nature for all intents and purposes. Just like the law of conservation of momentum and the law of inertia. Is it logical, then, to assume that while God must preserve the existence and enforcement of all the laws of nature, the law of conservation of matter will be preserved and enforced by itself?
As Descartes said: Just as God needs to move the moon from point P1 to point P2 in space, so he needs to move the moon from point T1 in time to point T2 in time in order to adapt its behavior and state to the law of conservation of mass-energy.

And a second view from a more logical direction:
A state of affairs that logically follows from another state does not require any power or creation or creation. For it is in fact equivalent to what already exists, and there is no novelty in it. However, any new state, that is, a state of affairs that does not follow purely logically from any other state, is a state that must be created out of nothing. That is, a state that requires power to be invested in its creation, and power belongs to the spiritual world. (Matter is dead)
The fact that a material body is at a certain point. Let's call it T1 in time and at a certain point P1 in space. That is, in a total state of T1P1. It does not logically follow from this that it must be in any other state, say in a state of T2P2.
That is, it is not logically deduced that the same body will also exist at some other moment T2. And at some other place P2. Therefore, spiritual-powerful intervention is required in order to transfer the body from state T1 to T2.
And that spiritual power has a logical existence. (Either because of the ontological view or because that is how we place our findings on the unknown here.)
 
What does the Rabbi think about these things? Which appear in his book A Scientific Logical Missile to God and Back, approximately pp. 68-70.
 
 


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 8 שנים
I didn't understand the first one. Just because something is called a law doesn't mean it has the same status as any other law. The laws of logic are also called laws. The second seems reasonable: if something happens, it needs a reason. A law is not a reason unless it is an entity. It may be inherent in the nature of things, but someone did that too.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button