The point of contention in the debate
It seems to me that the point of disagreement between you and Aviv is whether (in the absence of evidence) we should trust our natural intuition or the principle of causality that applies to everything. You said in the debate very briefly that only with intuition do we truly encounter. Apparently we also encounter the principle of causality all the time, why do you think intuition is stronger?
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
David Hume has already shown that we don't encounter causality at all. It's our way of thinking, and as an empiricist he did reject it. No one has ever seen that event A was the cause of event B. You can see temporal coherence and that it always happens. But causality involves something else: causation. No one has ever seen that.
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer