Women in the cause

I once saw a beautiful explanation (I think in the book of the Rabbi from Maor Yisrael). His argument is that according to the Rabbi that the Idna does not have a sabbath, the obligation of the sabbath of our time is nullified, and this does not mean seeing oneself as if one had left Egypt (and as is known, even during the Exodus from Egypt they did not have a sabbath. This is a Roman custom). But the mitzvah still remains to show oneself as if one had left Egypt, and this of course does not depend on the custom of this time (after all, you are showing what was then), but rather in the form of a general Sage ruling (they apparently thought that the sabbath was also in Egypt). This obligation is imposed only on the one who conducts the seder (in the sestma, this is the man) who is the narrator and shows the sabbaths what happened in the Exodus. Therefore, although women of the Idna are as important and obligated to have a sabbath as men, the obligation of the sabbath is nullified for both them and men according to the Rabbi. But the obligation of showing oneself as part of the story of the Exodus from Egypt remains, and this is imposed on the man. The Vespers of the NEP: 1. This obligation does not apply to men at the table who are not conducting the seder. 2. If a woman conducts the seder, she is obligated to perform the seder.