You sinned.

The Rabbis and the Sages of the Barish community disagreed on whether a person who commits an act of sin is liable for two sins or one sin, and some have linked this to the question of whether the act of sin and the result are separate prohibitions or not. Assuming that the liability for sin does not arise from the actual act of the offense but from the negligence that led to the mistake, it is reasonable to say that even if these are separate prohibitions, the person will be liable for one sin because he was negligent, and this is because he had to remember to avoid one category (everything whose purpose/mode of action is x) and this is one negligence. What is your opinion?