An example of a strange chatterbox
Your definition of the difference between 'chatter' and 'demand' is well known. It is also important to note that chattering is a paradox, all of whose steps seem correct, but its conclusion is somewhat puzzling.
I wanted to ask: Can you give me an example of such a quibble? I remember something in Aryeh's Roar about the killing of Amalek by women. In any case, could you provide me with an example of the quibble, I needed it for a certain piece of work.
Varda, your forum post is certainly a fine and pointed example…
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
Who is Varda, and where is her pepper?
What you remember is not the Shaga but the Avanz. He explains why the teaching writes that women are exempt from killing Amalek and are obligated in the war of the seven nations. The explanation he offers is that the killing of the seven nations is done so that we will not be deceived by them (so that they will not fail us in the war), and therefore killing them on Shabbat is permissible since it is like killing a snake so that it will not bite us, and so on. In any case, the mitzvah is not dependent on time and women are obligated to it. But killing an Amalek requires a body and is therefore forbidden on Shabbat, and therefore it is a work of the war and women are exempt.
Another issue is the obligation of a sash with a tzitzit: And what about a garment with four wings that is exempt from a mezuzah that is required to have a tzitzit, while a sash that is required to have a mezuzah is not required to have a tzitzit?! And the same applies to the obligation of a garment with four wings with a mezuzah.
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer