חדש באתר: מיכי-בוט. עוזר חכם המאומן על כתבי הרב מיכאל אברהם.

Perforated and non-perforated flowerpot

שו"תPerforated and non-perforated flowerpot
שאל לפני 3 שנים

The laws of a named and unnamed plant are based on the question of whether the plant is suckering from the ground, as is the law of planting outdoors, etc. Usually, a potted plant that is not named is also forbidden by the rabbis, but there may be exceptions (such as what is considered permissible in the seventh year for a potted plant that is not named under a roof). In light of today's scientific knowledge, should the legal boundaries regarding what is suckering and what is not suckering be updated? Because in reality, we are left to deal with the boundaries established by the Gemara, and the interpretation of the Rishonim (the distinction between wood and clay, planting outdoors, etc.)


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

תגיות השאלה:

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 3 שנים
If there is indeed a difference, then clearly there is. This is a rule that is based on error and is automatically null and void. But I don't know if this is really the scientific situation. Keep in mind that there is no rule about the amount of sucking that determines this matter, and therefore it is difficult for me to see how science could decide anything here. This is in contrast to mixtures of prohibition, permission, and swallowing, where there are quantities (sixty, most, etc.), and therefore it is possible to test this scientifically.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button