Several questions and requests for the rabbi

A. In the notebook on the status of Mount Sinai – you apparently didn't solve much. You presented the historical argument that it is always possible to assume that there was a transplant. In seminars on values, they try to prove that it wasn't. You didn't reject it at all and left the possibility that it could have been transplanted. I would be happy to understand.
B. I once heard you say that a person who does not take sides is a secret atheist. In my opinion, this is not true. A person who believes to a certain degree may indeed be exposed to evidence against his belief and then, due to a more logical argument, change his position. This is legitimate. Although for the system that belief in God represents something real, exposing a person to arguments that may cause him to abandon the true faith would be an injustice.
 
C. Does the rabbi have written material of the lectures in the audio section? That is, the lectures are written down.
D. I have heard many people complain that the rabbi writes his books in a rather complex and complicated way. I know that because of this the rabbi will not change the next editions to easier Hebrew, but we would be happy that in the books that come next the things will be more understandable even to the general public who wants to read the rabbi's books and understand and delve deeper. The books of Yuval Steinitz, for example, are famous for their wonderful clarity that makes it easier for the reader.
 
I would love to hear from you, my friend.