The world to come in the face of divine intervention

Regarding intervention, you wrote that you don't accept it because…
1. No indication.
2. The burden of proof is on the one who claims. And none was presented.
3. Does not fit with the scientific worldview.

The same things can be said about the next world, and even more:
– Not mentioned in the Torah (Providence is mentioned).
– If Providence has some kind of "merit points" (which you deny) of the survival of the Jews and the return to Zion, then the world to come has no "merit points".
– Providence is still somehow defined, compared to what is called "the next world." The next world is even more amorphous. Maybe even "nonsense."

Why do you believe that providence does not exist and even write about it, but regarding the "world to come" you are content with "I don't know"? If I didn't miss something in the explanation I wrote above, it goes without saying that according to you there is no world to come, right?