חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם. דומה למיכי בוט.

And you did whatever he told you.

שו"תAnd you did whatever he told you.
שאל לפני 2 שנים

The justification for accepting the interpretation of Chazal (regarding legislation, I understood that it was based on Rambam and Ramban) is from the verse and did whatever he ordered. I have several questions on the subject: A. Why does every person called a Tanna or an Amora necessarily say that he is such a genius, what is the difference between us and them (as far as I understand, today's generation is much more rational), and besides, why did they reserve the rule for the period of the Amoraim and Tannaim, why don't we start interpreting it ourselves?
B. From what I understand, the verse is specifically talking about the Sanhedrin. Is this an extension of the Chazal themselves, and if so, is this not the desired assumption (an interpretation of the verse by virtue of which the Chazal derive authority to interpret the rest of the verses)?


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 2 שנים
A. First, you are confusing genius with rational. These are not synonyms. But beyond that, the authority of the sages does not stem from their being wise or rational, but from our having accepted their words as a binding framework. This is the law. This is formal, not substantive, authority. Search the site for these concepts here. There is also a great deal of logic in establishing such a framework, and I have also argued for this in several places. B. Commitment to the Talmud is not based on "La Tesur" or another verse, but rather on public acceptance.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button