חדש באתר: מיכי-בוט. עוזר חכם המאומן על כתבי הרב מיכאל אברהם.

Game Theory Auction

שו"תGame Theory Auction
שאל לפני שנה 1

I was reading an article about economics and game theory and came across the following paragraph:
"I happened to walk into a lecture on game theory, and the lecturer gave an example of a beautiful model called a second-price auction," she says. "In a second-price auction, all bidders are told: Bid in a sealed envelope the maximum price you are willing to pay, and in fact you will pay the second highest price offered. That way, they have nothing to lose by offering the true value. Let's say they bid 100 and the second price was 80, then they will only pay 80 and benefit from the difference anyway. If they bid less than the second price, they will lose the product. Therefore, it is better for them to bid the price that the product is really worth to them. Studies show that this is a method that encourages people to tell the truth."
I think it doesn't necessarily incentivize people to bid the price that the product is worth to them, because if it's important to them to buy the product then they won't want to risk bidding lower than the second place. Maybe two people will bid above their price and they'll win the auction?
Am I missing something? Can you help me understand?


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני שנה 1
I immediately looked for an article or lecture by my friend Michal Feldman on this topic. I found that's where I took the quote (she's the speaker): https://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1001496727 First of all, as far as I know, the 'second price auction' thesis has been confirmed in empirical studies, meaning that people are indeed incentivized to tell the truth. Although one can still wonder why. The assumption is that everyone makes their own decisions. That's why they offer a price based on their own decision and not coordinated with anyone else. When you think about it alone, you make the consideration she describes there: If I offer more than I'm willing to pay, it could hurt me because I might win. If I offer less than someone else is offering, I won't win. That's why I offer what's really worth paying for me. It seems to me that you assume that he wants to win the product at all costs and ignore the fact that he also doesn't want it at a price that is too expensive.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button