His/her own
If you can explain to me the discussion of this philosophical assumption, that a being can only speak in its essence through its actions (Aristotle's prohibition)
What is this?
A- If you can give me an example of a person I am talking about, either his body or his actions.
In – What is the profit?
Rabbi Moshe Rat answered me that even in humans, not to mention their bones, we do not perceive the bones of anything, but rather the appearance of things.
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
I think he took it from me. This is Kant's distinction between phenomenon and noumena. But still, Maimonides claimed that in relation to God, negative adjectives are needed, which he did not claim regarding humans or material objects. One can say of a person that he behaves well and that he has a good heart. One can say of God that he behaves well but not that he has a good heart. But this is not entirely accurate, since one can say of him that he is good in some abstract sense. Maimonides insisted that this is only in a negative sense, but the Kabbalists (who are your beloved) claim that it also has a positive meaning (in the Sefirot, which are His garments/appearances).
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer