חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם. דומה למיכי בוט.

Correct use of thirteen dimensions

שו"תCorrect use of thirteen dimensions
שאל לפני 9 שנים

Good week,
When a person uses thirteen virtues, or in general non-positivist thinking, to study Torah and make legal rulings, he can extract many innovations from the Torah. When it comes to the Sanhedrin or even a kabbalah-based posek, then his words will be accepted. If it comes from a high school student, it is likely that they will not…
Is there any parameter by which we can determine whether the things learned are true or valid?

Maybe we will only accept this from someone who has filled his stomach with Shas and Poskim – does he have a "mind of Torah"? (How do we know who meets the criteria?)
Perhaps we will accept this based on the public's acceptance of that innovator's rulings? (And how will we examine his first innovation?)


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 9 שנים
Hello. You are looking for criteria for the individual, and here I disagree with you. As far as I am concerned, things are examined on the merits of the matter and not on the individual. If they are right in my opinion, I will accept them, and if not, then I will not. The question of authority is a different question. Authority like that of the Sanhedrin gives validity to decisions by the very fact that they were made in a particular institution, sometimes even in cases where they are incorrect (it is indeed a complicated issue of the one who errs in the mitzvah of listening to the words of the sages at the beginning of the tractate of Horyot). But today it is a hypothetical question because no one, person or institution, has authority.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button