Q&A: An Example of Bizarre Pilpul
An Example of Bizarre Pilpul
Question
Your definition of the difference between “pilpul” and “derash” is well known. The essence of it is that pilpul proceeds by way of paradox: every step seems correct, yet the conclusion is somewhat puzzling.
I wanted to ask: could you give me an example of such a pilpul? I seem to remember something from the Sha’agat Aryeh about women killing Amalek. In any case, could you provide me with an example of pilpul? I need it for a certain paper.
And by the way, your forum post is certainly a nice and sharp example…
Answer
Who is “Varda,” and where is her pilpul?
What you remember is not the Sha’agat Aryeh but the Avnei Nezer. He explains why the Sefer HaChinukh writes that women are exempt from wiping out Amalek but obligated in the war against the seven nations. The explanation he offers is that killing the seven nations is done so that we not seek them out unnecessarily—so that they not cause us to stumble in idolatry—and therefore killing them on the Sabbath is permitted, since it is like a labor not needed for its own purpose (as with killing a snake so that it will not bite us, and the like). Consequently, the commandment is not time-bound, and women are obligated in it. But killing Amalek is needed for its own purpose, and therefore is forbidden on the Sabbath, so it is a time-bound positive commandment and women are exempt.
Another pilpul is the obligation of a doorpost in tzitzit: if a four-cornered garment, which is exempt from mezuzah, is obligated in tzitzit, then a doorpost, which is obligated in mezuzah, all the more so should be obligated in tzitzit! And similarly regarding the obligation of a four-cornered garment in mezuzah.
Thank you very much! Yes, that is indeed what I meant. “Varda” was a slip of the pen for “and by the way,” an automatic keyboard typo.