Answer

Good question. I don’t know.
First, I’m not sure this is such a great success, nor that it changes much. These are distant countries, and peace with them is far from being significant. Moreover, in the first crisis we have here in the region, I assume these peace agreements will blow up in our faces, just as keeps happening all the time with Egypt and Jordan. True, here we did not pay a significant price, unlike with Jordan and Egypt, so there isn’t much risk here—but also not a very significant gain.
Second, I’m really not sure this has to do with Bibi’s abilities, rather than with new circumstances in the Arab states (after the Arab Spring and so on), and mainly with his ties to Trump and the chance event (fortunate from his point of view and miserable from the point of view of the Americans and most of the rest of the world) that brought about Trump’s election. He bet on the horse that happened to win, and that didn’t happen because of skill but because the alternative (the Democrats) is completely against him. Now Biden has been elected, and I assume it will be harder for him to carry out policy. Here we may perhaps see his abilities. Under a Democratic administration, there is perhaps a greater chance for people from the Left and Center here to advance matters.
Third, in any case, it is quite clear that this is not connected to policy but to connections and abilities. Therefore it could not have been known in advance what or who would succeed, and in which direction. My claim was not that nothing new could happen, but that whatever happens would be the result of pressures, circumstances, and constraints, and not of the personalities playing on the field. Under the circumstances of Trump, I see no necessity that a different prime minister of ours would not have reached the same results, and perhaps even more.
And fourth, anyone who makes forecasts fails. The only person who doesn’t fail is someone who never tried to make any prediction at all. Therefore, a failure like this, even if I accept that it is a failure (and I’m not at all sure of that, as above), does not necessarily mean anything. Ben-Gurion already said that all experts are experts in what was, not in what will be.
Fifth, in areas where it matters more who holds the office—that is, not in foreign policy matters but in domestic matters—our situation is a disaster. The man is harmful and corrupt and self-indulgent, and nothing interests him except Bibi. Therefore I continue to stick to my position not to decide whom to vote for based on foreign policy (which he doesn’t have, and which also doesn’t really matter), but based on the domestic agenda. On internal matters, the agenda and the coalition you build do have influence.
But of course, everyone acts according to his own forecasts (each man plays his own tune). I’m not forcing anyone to listen to me or act according to my advice.