Question

There are many Israelis [most of them] who think that our security, or the demographic problem, takes precedence over this or that human right.
And therefore they will always support a law that prevents family unification between Palestinians and Israelis.
Since the law is problematic, it is valid only as a temporary emergency measure, which gets extended every year.
That has been the practice for 20 years.
 
Now, out of a political desire to embarrass the new government [and it is not even clear that this embarrasses the government more than the opposition…], many of the Jews joined the opposition and brought down the law.
The meaning: a security and demographic danger, and intermarriage [in a second-order circle].
A tremendous effort is made to bring Jews to the Land of Israel [with adaptation difficulties and no simple sacrifice], and it all looks like a joke in the face of the flooding in of Palestinians, all for dubious political gain.
To our disgrace, even the rabbis [yes, those who are really expert in the laws of hand-washing, examining witnesses, and a few other things…] did not condemn this [at any rate, most of them].
Isn’t this already within the realm of baseless hatred, which according to the Sages is why we were exiled from here for 2,000 years? Isn’t this really just like the burning of the storehouses by the zealots?
Am I seeing reality correctly? Or are my eyes deceiving me?
[There is the excuse: we’ll pass a Basic Law on immigration and the like. A. It’s a poor excuse—first of all, protect what already exists and don’t endanger everything. B. Apparently such a law has neither legal feasibility nor political feasibility. C. Whoever claims he’ll do it did not do it during 12 years in power.]
If the Rabbi has an answer that would put my mind at ease that we are not in some kind of internal baseless hatred—or even some sort of Berditchev-style charitable justification—that would really make me happy…