Q&A: Leaving the Decision to Others
Leaving the Decision to Others
Question
They put me at a station with a button such that if I press it, a certain person will be saved from death (and let us assume it will cause him pain in his leg). Of course, it is my halakhic or moral duty to press that button. I can pull a bell, and then I will be removed from the station and another person will be placed there facing that same button. For some reason, I do not want to take the decision upon myself. Am I allowed to leave it to someone else? We are dealing with guarding against violating a prohibition, not with failing to fulfill a positive commandment. And what if it is somehow known that I and the other person are equally likely, for whatever decision we make, to decide either way (it may be that the correct decision carries some personal cost, and it is not certain that either I or he will make it). And what if it is known that the other person has a better chance than I do of not giving in to his inclination, and therefore will make the correct decision—would it then be permitted for me to evade and transfer the responsibility to him? Is there a Talmudic passage connected to this discussion? [In my opinion, one is allowed to transfer it to someone else if the probability of the correct decision does not go down].
Answer
I do not see what the question is. If you are already in a situation where saving is needed, then you must save now and not wait. If the moment has not yet arrived and you are only standing guard and waiting for the time when your help will be needed, then of course it is possible to switch shifts. Can a soldier / police officer / Magen David Adom volunteer not ask a friend to swap shifts with him?!
Discussion on Answer
Morally, I do not see any difference between you and someone else. But of course it is not fair to the other person either, since he also may not want to make decisions like that. So hold a lottery between yourselves.
It is possible to save now, and it is also possible to save later. The trolley is moving toward five people, and within ten minutes one has to decide whether to divert it toward the one person or not. But I have no interest at all in standing in that painful dilemma, so I take an anesthetic and update someone else about the situation so that the decision is on him. In a shift swap, the obligation is contractual, and that seems a bit different. Is your answer that in this situation it is permitted to evade the decision?