Q&A: Morality
Morality
Question
Who determines moral values? What seems ethical and proper to me may seem unethical and improper to someone else. In my view, it is not proper to vote for a party whose leader is a criminal. In the view of many other people—quite a few of whom, I assume, are ethical and moral people—it is proper to vote for that same party. Is there a single objective standard by which one can determine what is moral and proper? And who says that I’m right and the other person is not? Is there even such a thing as more right or less right in morality? Suppose there were no halakhic prohibition against stealing, and someone asked me whether I would steal money from someone. I said of course not. Then they asked me: if the richest person in the world were to lose a sum of 10,000 shekels, and you had the option either to take it for yourself or return it to him, what would you do? I said I would take it for myself. He would never know about it, and even if he did know, it would make no difference to him. So does the fact that I think I wouldn’t need to return it make me less moral than someone who would return it?
Answer
The Holy One, blessed be He. The fact that there is disagreement does not mean there is no truth. So one person is right and the other is mistaken—just as in Jewish law or any other decision. We have to make decisions without certainty. As for taking differing positions into account, search here on the site for a column on peer disagreement.