חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם

Q&A: It seems connected to territorial considerations

Back to list  |  🌐 עברית  |  ℹ About
Originally published:
This is an English translation (via GPT-5.4). Read the original Hebrew version.

It seems connected to territorial considerations

Question

And likewise, when a dangerously ill patient is in a very cold apartment, to the point that it is dangerous for him if the home is not heated, even though the neighbor has a heater on, there is no need to ask him to give up his comfort and bring the patient into his home; rather, they should turn on the heater in the patient’s apartment, because saving a life overrides the Sabbath. And even if they asked the neighbor to bring the patient into his home, he is not obligated to comply with their request (following Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchatah 32, note 174, who derived this from the law of “one who comes in through a tunnel,” where the homeowner is not required to yield to the thief).

Answer

Yes, these are well-known words of Rabbi Shlomo Zalman.
Apparently you are right, but I think it is not exactly that. Territorial considerations deal with the fact that I cannot make decisions on behalf of someone else. Here the issue is what the other person is or is not supposed to do himself with his own property.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button