חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם

Q&A: Conflicting Admissions by a Litigant

Back to list  |  🌐 עברית  |  ℹ About
Originally published:
This is an English translation (via GPT-5.4). Read the original Hebrew version.

Conflicting Admissions by a Litigant

Question

There are witnesses that he borrowed on Sunday, and witnesses that he repaid. The borrower claims, “I did not borrow” (an admission by a litigant that he did not repay). The plaintiff claims, “I lent only on Wednesday” (an admission by a litigant that he did not lend on Sunday). What is the law? Alexander’s approach of “chopping off heads” does not fit here, because each one is forcefully claiming against the other.

Answer

What is the problem? The admissions do not conflict. He did not borrow, and therefore there is no problem with the fact that he did not repay.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button