חדש באתר: עוזר בינה מלאכותית המבוסס על כתביו ושיעוריו של הרב מיכאל אברהם

Q&A: International Relations

Back to list  |  🌐 עברית  |  ℹ About
Originally published:
This is an English translation (via GPT-5.4). Read the original Hebrew version.

International Relations

Question

Hello,
If we set aside for a moment the whole complex system of Israel’s relations with the international community, such as antisemitism and so on, and focus only on the legal and moral aspect, do you think Israel is obligated to uphold the laws of war agreed upon by the nations of the world, in relation to states and organizations that, by treaty or in their declared aspirations, are committed to the destruction of Israel and the Jews?
In my opinion, international laws of war exist in order to place reasonable limits on the suffering caused by wars that break out in good faith (if one can put it that way in such a context) between states that have a conflict and are unable to resolve it peacefully. A state under threat of annihilation—and as far as I have checked, the only state under such a threat is Israel, and the only people under such a threat is the Jewish people—cannot, morally and even practically, abide by those laws. Morally and legally, the nations of the world and the international community cannot demand this of us, after they have done nothing real against the states and organizations threatening us.
What do you think?

Answer

The basic principle is that the law should be followed, including international law. But where it is clearly immoral, or where others do not follow it and only demand that we follow it, or where in our case it is not really relevant (even if others think it is), then obviously there is no reason to follow it. I am speaking only morally, not about damages or politics.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button