Faith Lesson 37

Question about the Faith series. Lesson 37 on YouTube.
The Rabbi gave two critiques of David Yom's witness argument.
One: It attacks on the basis that his claim does not stand the test of refutation. After all, it is not possible to receive any evidence or even experience supernatural things. That's why I asked – after all, even the proofs for the existence of God, as well as for His revelation, do not stand the test of refutation.
But this merely concludes that the reality of God and His revelation are not scientific, nothing more. David Yom also proves the witness's claim in a non-scientific manner, so the first criticism is not clear to me.
I would be happy for an answer.