Learning from history: the subtle difference
Happy Holidays!
In the first commandment, you give a set of considerations for the validity of revelation and add broader considerations – and within them you include the lesson from the unique history of the people of Israel, and even add the fulfillment of prophecies. From this you learn that we are unique.
Without a person in control of the spirit, you dedicate a chapter to the fact that it is impossible to really learn anything (metaphysical) from history (since it is so complex), and everyone learns from it what they want to get out of it.
What's the difference? To say that we are unique and that the nations of the world "consciously and even more unconsciously," as you put it, take notice of this – isn't that studying metaphysics from history?
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Why metaphysics? This uniqueness is a simple fact.
Beyond that, I also learn metaphysics (that there is a God) from physical facts. When I said that nothing can be learned – I meant specific ideological statements.
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer