חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם. דומה למיכי בוט.

Maybe our specific laws are a necessity of reality?

שו"תMaybe our specific laws are a necessity of reality?
שאל לפני שנה 1

In the context of seeing from the specialness of the specific laws, you argue that either the laws of nature were drawn or they are designed, because they are special (allowing low entropy) then they were designed.
But what about the possibility that the laws of nature must be these laws, for example, the value of pi must be the value of pi, it is impossible to imagine a system of laws in which pi is a different value. Perhaps as science progresses and we eventually arrive at some single equation or constant that describes all the laws of nature, we will realize that it is impossible to imagine any other constant, something like 1=1 or something like that. Just as pi cannot be otherwise, it is possible that the other laws of nature are also subject to some logical reality, and they were not drawn or designed, just as logic was not designed or drawn.


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני שנה 1
First, you are mixing mathematics with physics. Second, the value of pi is not necessary either. Only in Euclidean space. The decision whether the world will be Euclidean or not is a decision like any other. The possibility that all laws of nature are necessary in themselves (a Pythagorean approach) means that there is no physics in the world. It is all mathematics and logic. Therefore, observations are not necessary to know the world. Nobody really believes this today.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button