Sermons of the Sages
What is the Rabbi's position on the question of the extent to which the sermons of the Sages are a "mathematical" study of the text of the Torah according to the rules of the sermons, and to what extent do they merely serve to anchor beliefs?
Although we found in the first ones that they explained that the sermon influences taking a position in a controversy regarding the sermons, they deal there between two alternatives.
If indeed the explanation is only a tool within the sermon, why can't it be used on its own? A poske who was asked today about the fence of a certain harm would compare a word to a word, and that is enough. Why is it not enough, for example, to decide whether he was burned because of his arrows or because of his own (where Tos explained that the explanation determines the sermon)?
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer