Table set
peace
A religious Jew actually subordinates his will to the will of God – Halacha
But for example, the Shulchan Arbiter rules that a person must say that everything God does is for good. It seems to me that this is a sign of the rel section.
It would seem to contradict this, then, that God left the earth.
So what is the practical validity of this law?
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
First of all, the wording in the Shulchan Aruch is that 'a person should always be accustomed to saying,' and therefore it is clear that this is not a law but a recommendation. The Shulchan Aruch does not always make a careful distinction between laws and recommendations, but here it is quite clear.
Beyond that, even if he had ruled that way, I would not agree with him. A halakhic ruling has no meaning regarding facts.
And finally, in light of what I said in the previous two sections, these are things that the Shulchan Arbiter thinks and not the will of God (if he is wrong, then it is certainly not the will of God). A Jew's submission is supposed to be to the will of God and not to the will of Rabbi Caro (except to the extent that he expresses the will of God).
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer