The role of the new Sanhedrin
peace,
In your third book in the trilogy (page 617), you write that it is not the role of the Sanhedrin to decide disputes and abolish customs and differences of opinion, and if that happens – it will be a pipe dream.
I would be happy to explain why.
For me, that would be a great dream. Enough with the Ashkenazim-Sephardim-Yemenites and this and that. Enough with the continuation of the disputes that originated in the Diaspora (according to Maimonides and I agree with him).
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
What's wrong with disputes? What's bad is that they will force me to act differently from what I think. The customs are unimportant to me (Yemenites, Ashkenazim, Sephardim), but different ways of ruling are an expression of different ways of thinking, and I see no reason to abolish them. Everyone should be allowed to do as they understand, except where uniformity is important. That's where the Sanhedrin's role is to intervene.
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer