Question

Have you read it? Is it good?
Another thing: he writes there [if I understood him correctly] that if there is a book in front of us, then through analytic examination we could only say that there are pages here with various lines and symbols. And only if we think synthetically would we be able to see before us a work with ideas… From an analytic perspective, is it impossible to grasp an idea from a book? Is that necessarily an addition to what already exists? By the way, after he finishes explaining this, he notes that one should look at your book Two Wagons and a Hot-Air Balloon, and he also cites your book…