The Principle of Sufficient Reason, Rabbi Michi's Version

I did not renew that our understandings should not be projected onto the world, but exactly the opposite. I have written more than once (also here on the site. I remember, for example, my comment on this in response to an article by Yoel Ben Nun in Akademut! I think) that there is a mistake among certain interpreters of Kant who perceive his words as if it were a limitation of ours (that we should not project from the phenomenon to the noumena). And it is not. On the contrary, in my opinion, everything that is said about the phenomenon is really said about the noumena. However, it is formulated in language drawn from our cognition (when we say that the table in front of me is red, we mean to say that it has a certain crystalline structure, which reflects red light to my eyes). This is not a limitation but a definition: everything we say about the table (like any other object or phenomenon in the world) is formulated in our language. This is how we talk about the table itself. Therefore, our conclusions about the world are certainly well-founded and justified. And well-documented.