חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם

Q&A: Two Questions

Back to list  |  🌐 עברית  |  ℹ About
Originally published:
This is an English translation (via GPT-5.4). Read the original Hebrew version.

Two Questions

Question

Just something I was thinking about:
For natural numbers, there is no end in a theoretical sense. (An end at the superficial level. For example: 99 is not the end of the numbers; you can always add another digit and increase the value.)
And numbers express the universe (in an abstract way).
Does the fact that they have no end hint that the universe also has no end?
 
Another question that came to mind, and I found a hypothesis that holds a similar idea:
In a place to which we have no natural access (in terms of consciousness), there is no consistency of the kind we are used to. Like at the quantum level of objects.
And the moment one is exposed to it, the consistency we are used to comes into effect.
Could this not open the door to supernatural things that come into being as long as we are not exposed to them, even at the macro level that we know? (“Blessing is found only in something hidden from the eye.”)
And the hypothesis that holds a similar idea is the ‘simulation hypothesis.’ In this hypothesis (at least according to how I understood it from Wikipedia), among other things they conjecture that in things to which we have no access (in terms of consciousness) there is a “saving of memory,” and this is expressed, for example, in quantum theory.
Have a good week!

Answer

By your logic, every box is infinite. After all, the positions inside a box can be described by numbers.
Logical consistency must exist everywhere, regardless of whether we know it or not. I have pointed out here several times in the past that logic is not a kind of lawfulness like physics.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button