Q&A: What You Asked For
What You Asked For
Question
In the Rabbi’s books, he frequently uses the concept of intuition, but the points are not proven completely by an inference that cannot be escaped. I tried to turn the points into a certain argument. I would be glad to hear the Rabbi’s opinion.
Answer
I didn’t understand what you wanted from me on this matter.
I don’t understand exactly what you were trying to argue in the file, what that argument is that cannot be escaped, and how all this is connected to my positions regarding intuition.
So I’ll only note that your basic assumption there is mistaken. When I ask whether a real world exists or not, I am not assuming that there is a real world, but only that there is a concept of a real world, or a possibility of a real world. I am simply asking whether such a concept is actually instantiated or not. It is exactly like asking whether fairies exist. There is no assumption here that there are fairies in the world. The concept of a fairy is clear to me, and I am asking whether it is instantiated. And the same applies to causality and every other argument you raised there.
But as I said, I have no idea what you wanted to do with those arguments.