Does evolution have to explain everything?
According to the theory of evolution, is it possible for there to be things that are not useful or necessary for survival and on the other hand do not harm survival? In other words, does evolution claim that everything that exists is necessary for survival, or are there things that are not evolutionarily useful in their function and still exist (neutral in the evolutionary context)?
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
There is a preference for creatures that do not have unnecessary things, but there are complex processes of evolutionary drift and the like, in which unnecessary things are created and eventually they find a survival justification for themselves, or simply have not yet become extinct.
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer