Entropy – Is evolution so special?

Peace and blessings,
The Rabbi claims that complexity can be defined objectively by the number of possibilities that allow for state X in relation to all other possible states. And the complexity of a process will be measured by the ratio of the complexity of the initial state to the final complexity – the simpler the starting point and the more complex the final point, the more complex the process as a whole.
From this understanding, the Rabbi answers the common question that almost any set of laws will create a human being, and the Rabbi brings the fine tuning – which shows that all laws of nature are built (among other things) from 4 basic values, and any change in one of them will not allow the creation of humans.
You don't have to be a genius to understand that not every set of rules will create a person. But, even if not every set of rules will create a person, it can create a different complex reality.
Let's look at the gravitational constant – one of the four fundamental constants – as a dog, the stronger the force, then of course more unique and complex structures will be created. And the only chance that there will not be a process that turns something simple into something complex is just that the force is -0! Of course, the chance of this happening is 1/infinity.
And on the other hand, and as is usually claimed in the fine-tuning videos – in the case of a constant greater than the constant that prevails in our world, the matter that was created in the Big Bang will collapse back into a state of gravitational singularity. But in this case, the singularity will be found within real space (and not the space will be the size of the singularity as at the beginning of the bang). In such a case, for example, the singularity will be double and multiplied by that of a person! In relation to the possibility of a uniform distribution of energy/matter in space. Therefore, even according to the Rabbi, the complexity of the universe will not require sufficient reason (p. 41 in the third notebook).
Isn't that so?