חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם. דומה למיכי בוט.

God

שו"תGod
שאל לפני 2 שנים

I've been thinking about this recently. Our claim, believers, is a claim of fact: There is a God. And some of us, for the sake of example you and I, also claim evidence for this.
Does this make the existence of God a fact?
There will always be those who disagree, there are physicists who disagree about the Big Bang (although more so in the past), there are evolutionary biologists who disagree about evolution, and so on (these are just examples to convey the message that disagreement always exists).
The definition of proof is “something that is known or proven to be true.” We have evidence, and we claim that it proves the existence of God, meaning that his existence is proven and thus his existence is a fact?


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 2 שנים
You are mixing up different levels of discussion. The question of whether a claim is a claim of fact is not related to the evidence but to the content of the claim. The claim that it is now night or now day is a claim of fact (the first is true and the second is false), since it claims something about the world. If a claim of fact is proven, then it is a true claim of fact. If some people disagree with it, then there is a dispute about this claim of fact, and apparently some people do not accept the proof or its premises.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button