igod's "response" to your articles

Indeed, a collection of nonsense that deserves them.

1. My words cited sources showing that the Toshbap already existed before the destruction, which directly refutes their claim that the Toshbap was an invention after the destruction in order to keep power in the hands of the rabbis. There is not even a hint in my words about the claim regarding the relationship between the Toshbap and the Toshbap, nor is there even the slightest hint regarding the reliability of the Toshbap. Incidentally, there is no proof of the Pythagorean theorem there, nor the name of Jesus Messiah in the letter skips, nor even the name of the murderer of Arlozorov. In general, there are many other things that you will not find on that page in Tractate Pesachim. One thing appears there explicitly, and that is the refutation of the historical claim of the Messianic preachers. From there, you can simply see that their historical claim that the Toshbap was invented after the destruction is a factual lie (this is even before examining their ridiculous conclusions, even if their historical description were correct). As for the fact that it is impossible to prove the existence of the Toshbap from within, I would love to hear from them how they would propose to prove its existence? Is it better to make claims without proof at all, as they do? Indeed, that certainly avoids logical loops. That's for sure. See section 3 where they themselves are caught in such a loop, without blinking.
2. The preachers in the video addressed the issue of the Sanhedrin supposedly omitting the word "no" from the verse "You shall not follow many to lead astray." I thought I simply did not find the sermon, because it did not occur to me that they were simply lying. Now in their response it turns out that there really is no such sermon. Well, so now they kindly transfer us to BM 52b instead. Let us check if there is perhaps a sermon there that omits the word "no" from this verse, as they repeatedly claim. Can you, dear reader, help our Christians find the missing sermon? What you will find there is the verse "after many to lead astray," which is the end of the verse. There is no word "no" before it, and therefore it is not omitted, of course. But a liar remains a liar.
3. I don't know what to say about this claim. They brought irrelevant verses, and now they bring them back again, but don't explain why they are relevant. Because Jesus said they are relevant? Oh, I apologize for my weak command of the New Testament. It's interesting that here they don't hesitate to rely on the New Testament to prove the New Testament (which they claimed I did. See section 1). It's a shame, they could have brought much better evidence for the relevance of the verse: after all, in the video they themselves say that it is relevant. And they certainly know what they are saying. That's better proof, isn't it?
4. Here again there is a lie and distortion. I did not say that the Toshbap does not write to support the Torah scholars. On the contrary, of course it does, and rightly so. After all, it itself leaves them poor, and if you want them to be Torah scholars, then you definitely need to support them. What I wrote is that seeing this as a conspiracy is foolish, because there is concern here for people who do not belong to any group. The status of the Torah scholars is open to everyone. What group is making a conspiracy that takes care of anyone who wants to benefit from it? Moreover, they leave them poor and only ask to support them. I also added that within the framework of their inventions, they could certainly impose an obligation to give a quarter of your wealth to the Torah scholars. So why do they settle for a minor conspiracy like blessing the person who hosts the Torah scholars, etc.? But a lie is a lie.