Simulation B

In the SD
I saw a question here recently that popped up about life in a simulation, and I saw that it was a question that was imported from America. And some define it as the best and newest skeptical question.
I wanted to ask, do you think that someone who advocates materialism and that consciousness can exist in either an organic or digital brain , really doesn't have a great deal of doubt for him?
So, if you believe that it is possible (given Moore's Law) to create simulations that are indistinguishable from reality, and that it is possible to think that we will reach a level where it will be possible to imitate the world (extrapolation), then it is reasonable to assume that we live in a simulation ourselves. Because there will be more simulated worlds than normal ones.
Because I really think that anyone who advocates materialism should try to resolve this claim. But it sounds really strange.
on.
Using the term simulation imagines God as an intelligent being who coordinates the different parts of reality. Therefore, I think that much of the evidence for God will remain valid here as well.
But I wanted to ask whether in your opinion the evidence from epistemology – which deduces from our understanding an entity that corresponds to it, is also valid towards this understanding. Because it depends on how you understand the evidence, whether it is purely "inferential" (and then it is valid for this as well), or whether it is only valid if you are acquainted with what the theological evidence is trying to identify, and then only God (following religious sentiment) explains our knowledge in the best way, (because a person does not say that he is acquainted with the simulation) while towards God this is quite acceptable.