חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם. דומה למיכי בוט.

The categorical order and entry into the shelter

שו"תThe categorical order and entry into the shelter
שאל לפני 2 שנים

In the SD
Many argue that a person should enter the shelter of the categorical imperative, for if everyone does not do so, someone will surely be harmed.
And I want to discuss several aspects: 1- Here his decision will not affect others at all and there will not be a critical mass of anger that will cause harm.
(And not as theft from the state.) Is the answer to this that for Kant the commandment is not an outcome consideration, but an ontological one?
2- Apparently there is no harm to others here (except at most in the name of "the public" that one of them will die), does the order belong here? Or maybe it does because
That the SS is harming itself, but is this considered a moral decision?
Thank you very much!


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 2 שנים
I don't know who these rabbis are. I wrote that here on the site, and they uploaded a video of Rabbi Asher Weiss saying exactly these things. See there the implications regarding an offense upon entering the MMD. I have explained more than once (column 13, 122) that the categorical imperative by definition is not consequential. If there are consequences, there is no need for a categorical imperative. This answers both of your questions.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button