The column on the third identity

After everything we've been through in the last two years, and after the disproportionate participation of conservative religious Zionism (and even Mustard Zionism) in the war (with an emphasis on the people of the yeshiva line), do you still agree with the quotes below?
Is there really almost no practical difference or practical implications?
 
"There is currently no significant difference between the Religious Zionists and the Haredim in their attitude towards the state, except for reciting Hallel on Independence Day and the color of the kippah… Even clear differences, such as on the question of conscription into the army… have been diminishing in recent years, when the Haredim are already conscripting."
 
also:
 
"At least on a practical level, there is an identity between the Haredim and the Hardalim in their attitude towards questions of modernity and liberalism. The practical difference between the two groups is found only in the question of their attitude towards Zionism, such as in the principled sanctity they attribute to the state and its institutions, in reciting Hallel on Independence Day and Jerusalem Day, and in their attitude towards the complete Land of Israel. But none of this has almost any practical implications today."