Two carriages, second gate
A. Difference between matter (the thing in itself without its form, etc.) and a Platonic idea?
on. You write that usage rights are the non-essential part of the form. And I understand why. Ostensibly, they are the essential part of the form, except that there are situations in which the form does not appear (lack of a divorce decree). It is not the usage rights that are non-essential, but the form.
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
A. Is there a question here? What is the connection between these two? The idea is a pure form, the thing furthest from the substance of the thing.
B. It's semantics that I don't understand. The fact that it may sometimes not appear means that it's not essential.
לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
השאר תגובה
Please login or Register to submit your answer