Answer

Hello G.,
Let me begin by saying that the question of whether some claim is true or not is not judged by its implications—that is, by the harm or benefit in it (whether it helps or harms becoming stronger in faith). A claim should be examined on its own merits and according to its content. After one reaches the conclusion that it is true (or not), one can discuss its harm and benefit and how to deal with both.
 
Now to your actual question. I don’t know where you read that sentence, but I definitely think that the truth is with me (though not with certainty; every person can make mistakes). In addition, I also say that there is truth and that one is obligated to strive to reach it. It is possible that in the place where you read those words I was dealing with the second claim and not the first.
And one last thing: there is no such thing as faith without doubts. We are human beings, and as such we are destined to live with doubts. A person cannot reach certainty (for it is always possible that what you thought was mistaken. You never have a guarantee that you are not mistaken). Becoming stronger means acting according to your best understanding despite the doubts and despite the concern that maybe you are mistaken, but as a flesh-and-blood human being you are neither required nor able to eliminate the doubts. Postmodernism is mistaken in identifying lack of certainty with doubt, and with a multiplicity of truths or with there being no truth. Each of us has different beliefs, and if that is what a person thinks, then that is the truth from his perspective, and he should act accordingly. But one must always take into account that maybe you are mistaken, and at the same time not let that neutralize the conduct of your life according to your understanding. We are destined to live with a certain degree of uncertainty, but that does not mean there is no truth and that it is impossible to reach it. Contrary to the postmodern assumption, truth is not identical with certainty.