Q&A: Please explain the nature of the naturalistic connection
Originally published:
This is an English translation (via GPT-5.4). Read the original Hebrew version.
Please explain the nature of the naturalistic connection
Question
Where has the Rabbi written clearly about this fallacy? And is it a logical fallacy? On Wikipedia I saw that they write that it is not a logical fallacy
– https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9B%D7%A9%D7%9C_%D7%A0%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%99
Answer
I do not know what a logical and non-logical fallacy is.
As for the naturalistic fallacy, it has several definitions. In fact, I am speaking about Hume’s ought-is fallacy. The naturalistic fallacy is a somewhat different fallacy formulated by Moore. That is the accepted terminology. I wrote about it in several places, for example here: