חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם

Q&A: Sorry, Just a Referral

Back to list  |  🌐 עברית  |  ℹ About
Originally published:
This is an English translation (via GPT-5.4). Read the original Hebrew version.

Sorry, Just a Referral

Question

I’m trying to understand the topic of the enactments and decrees of the Sages in two respects.

  1. There are some very strange decrees (for example, that a woman should not walk in the marketplace with her child in front of her), with even stranger reasons given for them (“because of an incident that occurred”). So strange, in fact, that at this moment I don’t even remember whether the prohibition is to walk with the child in front of her or behind her.
  2. There are decrees of the Sages that somehow got lost, and nobody even remembers them. Not just the issue of pairs, where it isn’t stated that they enacted anything, but it is obvious to the Talmud that this is the rule and it deals only with the details, examples, and so on. There are actual decrees that were enacted and simply disappeared. (I can’t remember examples at the moment, but at one point I made a long list of such things.)
  3. This is besides the issue of how “lucky” commandments are, in the sense that even a positive Torah commandment can simply disappear and no longer be practiced (the prohibition of new grain, tefillin for many, many years—if I understood the plain meaning correctly. By the way, I’d be happy for a referral to something to read a bit about this matter of the neglect of the positive commandment of tefillin over centuries, at least from the time of the Talmud until Rabbi Moses of Coucy testified about himself that he brought many back from sin), for a reason that is itself rather strange (how did they even arrive at that???), and even today there are dolls in every Haredi home (yes, a few Briskers cut off noses. Come on, really). I mention this because maybe you once wrote about this too.
  4. In short, I’d appreciate it if there is some kind of “index” to your writing.
  5. Many thanks, and more power to you.

Answer

It’s hard to write a whole essay here about decrees. I don’t recall having written about these aspects.
If there is a specific question you’d like to discuss, please raise it. Better one at a time, otherwise it will be hard to conduct a discussion.
As for decrees instituted because of an incident that occurred, see many examples here, along with a bit of discussion:
http://forum.otzar.org/viewtopic.php?t=31852
Your difficulty is based on the assumption that the purpose of the decree is to prevent the harm that occurred in that incident. But in truth, in most cases that is not the situation. On the contrary: the expression “because of an incident that occurred” indicates this. In a few cases it may be possible to explain it that way, but in my opinion the broader way to understand such decrees is that their purpose is to fix the incident in memory and consciousness. But there is really no point in the prohibition as such.

Discussion on Answer

Michi (2020-04-19)

And regarding putting on tefillin, see here:
https://www.alysefer.com/tefilin/

Leave a Reply

Back to top button