Q&A: A Halakhic-Moral Dilemma
A Halakhic-Moral Dilemma
Question
I would appreciate your position regarding a certain situation which in the past I would have ruled out without hesitation, but today I am torn about, due to a more balanced perspective according to which perhaps some room should be given to an extra-halakhic consideration. I would be glad to know how you would recommend acting in it (or at least what considerations you would use to decide).
I am a section head in the army.
Serving under my command right now is a team leader who is not Jewish according to Jewish law (in his understanding he is “half-Jewish” because his father is Jewish), and he is now engaged to a female soldier from the unit who is, at least presumptively, Jewish.
What is the proper thing regarding attending his wedding?
On the one hand, it is clear that I am not happy about the situation being created, and on the objective halakhic and Torah level it is not exactly a cause for celebration.
On the other hand, if I neutralize that dimension, then:
A. This is someone with whom I have a commander-subordinate relationship, and a certain degree of mutual respect.
B. The human situation he is in is not of his choosing. Neither his identity nor specifically his serving under me. His choice amounted to enlisting and serving.
So if the halakhic aspect is set aside, there is no social, outward, or objective justification for my absence from “his wedding.” Not only would it be unusual by any standard, but it would leave no room for doubt that the halakhic consideration pushed aside and overrode the natural and expected consideration that follows simply from looking at the commander-subordinate relationship.
If the answer to the question somehow depends on my personal location and assumptions, then it is hard for me to place them on a scale, so I would be happy at least to hear the considerations for deciding. But I’ll give a case for illustration:
Throughout my years of service I was careful about avoiding physical contact, even formal handshakes with women in various military situations. At the same time, over the years, and with the ability to make an informed and rational distinction depending on the situation, I stopped refraining from personally pinning on a rank insignia rather than having it done through a female soldier-messenger (since it is only contact with a piece of pulled fabric, for inserting a pin).
Likewise, recently I chose to shake an outstretched hand of women as well (alongside the men) in parting at a work meeting abroad, where it was clear to me that there was no awareness of the issue of avoiding physical contact, and that refusal would be interpreted as rudeness and the like. Therefore I saw fit to base the decision to shake hands on the strict letter of the law (which, to the best of my understanding, according to some opinions is not prohibited in such a case. At least that was the understanding underlying my decision at that moment).
Thank you,
Answer
Hello,
Regarding handshakes, I do shake hands with women who are not aware of this issue. As long as it is not done with a sexual connotation, I do not think there is any prohibition in it, and it is proper to avoid causing offense.
Regarding going to the wedding, that is indeed a question that is hard for me to answer. If they will understand your absence and you can explain it to them, then perhaps it would be proper to do that. But it is truly a sensitive matter.
I assume these are people who do not believe in this whole halakhic matter, and are doing this innocently, as far as they understand. So from their perspective this is not really a transgression (in my view). And of course you are certainly not committing any transgression by attending (there is no issue here of “do not place a stumbling block”), and your recognition of the prohibition is not really relevant here (no one is seeking your validation). On the other side stands the hurt to them and the desecration of God’s name that could result. When there is no prohibition, in my opinion it is proper to avoid desecration of God’s name, and proper to maintain good and friendly relations. Therefore I tend to think it is proper to go.
By the way, it seems to me that the opposite case (a Jewish man with a non-Jewish woman) is more problematic. Their children will be non-Jews. And still, I tend to think it is proper to go.
Thank you.
Those were roughly my considerations as well, and the halakhic clarification that there is no prohibition helps put things in order.
And yes, they apparently do not believe in the halakhic aspect: both of them are aware of the halakhic limitation, yet he thinks that he “got screwed from both directions, because there I’m labeled Jewish and here I’m not,” and she too is going ahead with it despite being aware of the existence of the halakhic limitation. Of course, it could also simply be a transgression despite some degree of belief in the halakhic side and the problematic nature of the move, in the sense of “his impulse overpowered him” — but I have no basis to assume that. Their lifestyle, as far as I know, does not indicate that.