Natural laws – applicable

You mean an electron and an antielectron (not two electrons). This is an interesting claim. Conservation laws are ostensibly the results of the action of a factor that ensures conservation. While conservation of energy or momentum can be a result of the properties of the body itself (which does not change speed if no force acts on it), conservation laws in the formation of particles are indeed different. In the article below, I argued that such a formation contradicts a philosophical law of conservation (conservation of entity). This also indicates some external factor: https://mikyab.net/%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%97%D7%9B%D7%9E%D7%94-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%94-%D7 %95%D7%93%D7%A2%D7%AA-%D7%A2%D7%9C-%D7%93%D7%99%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%A7%D7%9 8%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%94-%D7%A9%D7%9C-%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%93-%D7%AA/ In negotiations I conducted with Talkbackists after my columns in YNET, the possibility arose that the world was created out of nothing through a quantum process, which makes the assumption that there is a creator unnecessary. I said that in my opinion this is a mistake because quantum creation is not really created from an absolute vacuum, but from a quantum vacuum. In other words, the laws of quantum theory do exist there (without them, there would be no spontaneous creation). Therefore, the question of who created the laws of quantum theory remains. It seems to me that this is also an answer to your question. Indeed, such a formation is governed by laws. It is not true that before it there was nothing. The question of whether the laws themselves are applicable – I am not sure, but ostensibly they are supposed to be actions of some being.