Objective morality

Why don't you ask about scientific truth? There are arguments there too. I assume the basis of the question is that these are non-factual areas (in the conventional sense). But I disagree with that, and in my opinion, these are facts (though not physical). In the field of morality, there is right and wrong because that is our clear feeling. Just as we have a clear feeling that there is a wall or a table in front of us and we will not accept skeptical appeals (which exist here as well). Regarding taste (literally, chocolate) and smell, I agree that there is no arguing. Regarding aesthetic and artistic taste, I'm a bit undecided. My tendency is that there's truth and falsehood there, but it's more flexible and allows for more legitimate positions within the framework. The question of what is the basis for the division is not clear to me. It is simply different because that is how you see it. What is the basis for the division between a cloud and a table? You simply see that these are two different things.